Baseline survey
Proven
Establish the value of a programme’s indicators before it starts, on the instrument the endline will repeat.
What you should know
- One record per unit on every collection surface. Member-level rosters — a household enumerated person by person — are held relationally by the platform, and there is no roster control on the field app or the web link, so a roster instrument is configured with your implementation team rather than built and fielded unaided.
- Change is reported descriptively — a value, a later value, and the difference between them. No causal or attribution claim is produced, because the platform implements no identification strategy and refuses to imply one.
- Baseline is a PHASE, carried on the study as a wave. It is not a separate product, a separate engine or a separate research mode, and a report is a baseline because the study says so — never because the title says so.
- A published Baseline report names the study and the wave it came from, so a Baseline and an Endline of the same study are distinguishable without reading their titles. Where a publication declares no wave, its phase reads as “not declared” rather than being guessed.
- Research mode that runs it
- Structured survey. A study type is what the work is commissioned as; the mode is the design the platform runs. See the mode.
- Study phase
- baseline — carried explicitly on the study as a wave, not inferred from the report title or from the date the fieldwork ran.
- Evidence it collects
- Selected · Written · Structured · Spoken
- Typical outputs
- Baseline report · Dataset and codebook · Analytical workbook · Indicator dashboard · Presentation
- Who commissions it
- NGO and INGO programmes · Donors · Evaluation firms · Government programmes
- How this is proven
- An end-to-end proof of this study type runs against the deployed platform on every release, and the release gate refuses the build if it is missing.
Which routes suit it
-
Phone Call
Bounded
Suits a short indicator battery.
-
WhatsApp
Bounded
Suits a short indicator battery.
-
SMS
Not suitable
A baseline instrument is too long for one message at a time.
-
Web link
Supported
-
Offline app
Primary
Midline study
Supported
Re-measure the baseline indicators part-way through a programme, while there is still time to change something.
What you should know
- One record per unit on every collection surface. Member-level rosters — a household enumerated person by person — are held relationally by the platform, and there is no roster control on the field app or the web link, so a roster instrument is configured with your implementation team rather than built and fielded unaided.
- Change is reported descriptively — a value, a later value, and the difference between them. No causal or attribution claim is produced, because the platform implements no identification strategy and refuses to imply one.
- A midline is a wave on the same study, with the same indicator identity and its own dataset version.
- Research mode that runs it
- Structured survey. A study type is what the work is commissioned as; the mode is the design the platform runs. See the mode.
- Study phase
- midline — carried explicitly on the study as a wave, not inferred from the report title or from the date the fieldwork ran.
- Evidence it collects
- Selected · Written · Structured · Spoken
- Typical outputs
- Monitoring report · Analytical workbook · Indicator dashboard
- Who commissions it
- NGO and INGO programmes · Donors · Evaluation firms
Which routes suit it
Endline survey
Supported
Repeat the baseline instrument at the end of a programme and report what changed.
What you should know
- One record per unit on every collection surface. Member-level rosters — a household enumerated person by person — are held relationally by the platform, and there is no roster control on the field app or the web link, so a roster instrument is configured with your implementation team rather than built and fielded unaided.
- Change is reported descriptively — a value, a later value, and the difference between them. No causal or attribution claim is produced, because the platform implements no identification strategy and refuses to imply one.
- Change is reported as the baseline value, the endline value, and the difference — in percentage points where the indicator is a proportion. Whether the programme caused that change is a question of evaluation design, and the platform will not answer it for you.
- Research mode that runs it
- Structured survey. A study type is what the work is commissioned as; the mode is the design the platform runs. See the mode.
- Study phase
- endline — carried explicitly on the study as a wave, not inferred from the report title or from the date the fieldwork ran.
- Evidence it collects
- Selected · Written · Structured · Spoken
- Typical outputs
- Endline report · Dataset and codebook · Analytical workbook · Presentation
- Who commissions it
- NGO and INGO programmes · Donors · Evaluation firms · Government programmes
Which routes suit it
Post-distribution monitoring
Supported
Check what people actually received, whether it was usable, and what it displaced — after a distribution has happened.
What you should know
- Linking a submission back to a specific distribution record is done through an identifier you carry on the instrument. The platform does not read your distribution list.
- Research mode that runs it
- Structured survey. A study type is what the work is commissioned as; the mode is the design the platform runs. See the mode.
- Study phase
- post distribution — carried explicitly on the study as a wave, not inferred from the report title or from the date the fieldwork ran.
- Evidence it collects
- Selected · Written · Structured · Spoken
- Typical outputs
- Monitoring report · Indicator dashboard · Dataset
- Who commissions it
- Humanitarian response · Cash and voucher programmes · INGOs
Which routes suit it
Programme monitoring
Supported
Keep a results framework current — routine measurement against targets, reported as status and variance rather than as a study.
What you should know
- Targets, achieved values, variance and status are carried on the indicator. Forecasting a trend forward is not implemented and is refused rather than approximated.
- Research mode that runs it
- Structured survey. A study type is what the work is commissioned as; the mode is the design the platform runs. See the mode.
- Study phase
- continuous monitoring — carried explicitly on the study as a wave, not inferred from the report title or from the date the fieldwork ran.
- Evidence it collects
- Selected · Structured · Spoken · Imported
- Typical outputs
- Monitoring report · Indicator dashboard · Board pack
- Who commissions it
- NGO and INGO programmes · Government programmes · Donors
Which routes suit it
Evaluation study
Supported
Answer evaluation questions about a programme — relevance, coverage, effectiveness as measured — on evidence with a traceable line back to who said it.
What you should know
- Change is reported descriptively — a value, a later value, and the difference between them. No causal or attribution claim is produced, because the platform implements no identification strategy and refuses to imply one.
- Treatment and comparison groups, and the design that defines them, are recorded as study metadata and analysed as a two-group comparison. Difference-in-differences, matching, regression discontinuity and interrupted time series are not implemented, and a request for one is refused with the reason rather than approximated.
- Research modes that runs it
- Structured survey, Qualitative research, Mixed methods. A study type is what the work is commissioned as; the mode is the design the platform runs. See the mode.
- Evidence it collects
- Selected · Written · Structured · Spoken · Imported
- Typical outputs
- Evaluation report · Evidence appendix · Analytical workbook · Presentation
- Who commissions it
- Evaluation firms · Donors · INGOs · Government
Which routes suit it
Programme review
Supported
Bring the quantitative record, the qualitative evidence and the programme’s own data together for a periodic review.
What you should know
- Mixed-methods evidence is assembled with your implementation team rather than from a single review screen. Every finding carries the source and form of the evidence behind it, so the strands stay distinguishable rather than being concatenated.
- Research mode that runs it
- Mixed methods. A study type is what the work is commissioned as; the mode is the design the platform runs. See the mode.
- Evidence it collects
- Selected · Structured · Spoken · Written · Imported
- Typical outputs
- Programme review report · Board pack · Presentation · Evidence appendix
- Who commissions it
- NGO and INGO programmes · Donors · Government programmes
Which routes suit it