Trusted Voice Research Infrastructure for NGOs, Governments & Global Development Partners
Executive and decisions

Recommendations, decisions and what happened next

You are the reason the rest of it exists. This guide covers what reaches you, what you are being asked to do with it, and how the platform records what you decided.

What you are responsible for

Responding to recommendations and owning decisions. The platform will not make one for you, and it will not let a decision quietly have no owner.

What reaches you

A recommendation arrives with the evidence behind it, a proposed owner and a state. It is not a summary of a report — it is a specific thing somebody is asking the institution to do, with what supports it attached.

The recommendation register, showing recommendations with their evidence, owner and current management response.
DEMONSTRATION · SYNTHETIC DATA Route: /app/recommendations.htmlRole: M&E OfficerEnvironment: previewCaptured: 2026-08-31

Management response

  1. Read what it rests on

    Every recommendation traces back to evidence and to the responses behind that. If it does not, it should not have reached you.

  2. Respond

    Accept, accept with modification, or reject. A rejection with a stated reason is a legitimate and useful outcome — an unanswered recommendation is not.

  3. Name an owner and a date

    A decision with no owner is a decision nobody takes. The platform holds the owner, not a shared inbox.

The decision record

Decisions are held with their owners and the actions that followed. The value is not the record itself — it is being able to answer, a year later, what was decided, on what evidence, by whom, and what happened.

The decision register, showing decisions taken, who owns each and the actions that followed.
DEMONSTRATION · SYNTHETIC DATA Route: /app/decisions.htmlRole: Organization AdminEnvironment: previewCaptured: 2026-08-31

Across countries

Where a programme spans countries, the portfolio view shows each deployment with its own figures. A combined number appears only where the indicators behind it have been assessed comparable — otherwise the platform refuses rather than publishing an average with a caveat.

The Regional Portfolio showing four country deployments — Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda and Tanzania — each with its response count, completion, flagged responses and studies.
DEMONSTRATION · SYNTHETIC DATA Route: /app/regional-portfolio.htmlRole: M&E OfficerEnvironment: previewCaptured: 2026-08-31

When something goes wrong

The failures that actually happen, and what to do about each.
What you seeWhat to do
A recommendation has no evidence attachedIt should not have been raised. Send it back rather than deciding on it.
Two reports give different figuresCheck their versions. Products render from an approved publication at a named version; two figures that disagree mean one is from an older version.
A combined regional figure is missingThe comparability assessment has not passed for those indicators. The refusal is deliberate — the countries did not field the same instrument.

Limits worth knowing before you plan around them

What this role cannot do, and what the platform does not offer

  • The platform records decisions; it does not execute them. No workflow reaches outside VoiceInsights to make something happen.
  • There is no disbursement, budget-utilisation or value-for-money analytics. No governed provider exists for any of them, and none is offered.
  • AI does not approve evidence, make an institutional decision, or authorise publication.